We’ve gotten TMI about Kirsten Baesler and her on again, off again fiancé, and what we’ve learned is that a violent or just short of violent confrontation isn’t criminal, especially if you were drinking at the time, and when our curiosity is sated with the fallacious notion that each person gave as good as they got, rather than the higher standard of two wrongs not forming a right, or the still higher, forgotten standard that public officers must behave above reproach.
What we have here is another Rauschenbergeresque case of papering over alcoholism, mixed with another Welleresque case of papering over domestic abuse. I’m sure all the parties involved feel some degree of shame, but at the end of the day you have criminals sitting in office, oddly adamant that whatever they did doesn’t undermine the public trust.
It is up to voters to hold such officials to account, and it is up to the Democratic-Nonpartisan League to be vocal in reminding voters about these tragic farces.
As a survivor of domestic abuse, I find Kristen Baesler’s behaviour chilling, especially as the police will hear about just the latest, just the worst of that tragic pattern of thought and action.
What do you do when struck by that rush of adrenaline, that flush of anger? Do you have what it takes to confront that gap between your expectations and reality? And if not – when you, the public servant, realize that you have committed a violent crime, do you first fear for your own pocketbook or for the integrity of the state? Do you have what it takes to resign?
The League has filed a bill, SB 2360, to provide for student consent to the release of directory information, after an election season debacle that binspammed thousands of North Dakota university students with political leaflets.
Students will now have the choice whether to make their contact details public knowledge.
It’s an important privacy measure, especially since there’s an entire Big Data industry with lax standards waiting to turn every publicly posted address, number, or eyeball magnet into an outlet for all manner of unscrupulous, misleading, and/or annoying messages.
The new healthcare premium data is out, and Blue Cross Blue Shield is raising rates on North Dakotans by 12-15% [based on Grand Forks County premiums]. Sanford is up by about 7%. Medica’s plans are holding much steadier with 3% and -0.6% changes.
Most people using the healthcare exchanges receive subsidies. For the median North Dakotan, age 36, the subsidy level is determined by the second-cheapest Silver plan offered for 2015, about $296.17 monthly. If that’s more than 8% of your monthly income, Uncle Sam will chip in to bring it down to a fair rate. If you haven’t got insurance yet, or want to switch your plans, HealthCare.gov is the place to go.
Snacks, cash bar, and chit chat over laptops and phones refreshing election results were the order of the evening, as fairly well all of the ballot measures seem destined for defeat.
Victories like Erin Oban defeating Margaret Sitte in Bismarck District 35 got the crowd warmed up. We’ll see how the rest of the night fares.
Update: The Grand Forks Dems were disappointed with the results, particularly in District 43, where well-liked local candidates merely treaded water in what had seemed like a close race. But local Leaguer Matt Leiphon said it best, “The sun still comes up tomorrow, we live to fight another day.”
CBC reports Premier Greg Selinger replaced five members of his cabinet as part of a major reshuffle, as the NDP government faces its most serious challenge since Gary Doer was appointed ambassador to the US.
This also comes in the wake of visible NDP figure Judy Wasylycia-Leis losing narrowly in the race for mayor of Winnipeg. Provincially, the NDP has been polling poorly lately and would likely lose a snap election. Naturally that’s why the opposition parties are clamouring for just that.
If you are a UND student relying on a Student Residency Certificate from the University of North Dakota for your voter ID, you may only have 5 hours left to vote or find better ID.
Those relying on Residency Certificates may as well throw them out if they do not show a Grand Forks address, and are not dated more than 30 days ago. The only way you will be allowed to vote in Grand Forks County without another ID is with a second person attesting your residency — and only if you get to the County Office building on South 4th Street before 4:30pm this afternoon. There is no attesting process on Election Day.
Grand Forks County Auditor Debbie Nelson spoke to j5mc in response to allegations aired about an hour ago on KFGO’s News and Views, that UND students were being turned away based on the date of their Student IDs.
That is not accurate, insofar as the Auditor has any records at all of the incident (more on that in a second), the Auditor’s position is that the student had a certificate [the Student ID itself does not show any address and is not acceptable as proof of residence] showing another North Dakota address and was resident at that address. The student in question can’t go to Twamley today and get a corrected version because a certificate must be at least 30 days old in order to prove sufficient time of residency.
Students who go to UND would obviously have been living in Grand Forks since the start of classes in August, but Nelson stated that directives from the Secretary of State make the 30 day requirement, based on documentation, rigid.
She also stated that there is no system for tallying, counting, or otherwise tracking the numbers or reasons people might be turned away from the polls, and that no such system is planned to be implemented by tomorrow at 6am.
Depending on how you reckon, it may be a few days off from the adoption of the original state constitution, or years off considering that North Dakota took the Dakota Territory capital and seal for itself.
The date we remember is 2 November 1889, the day that President Harrison went into a locked room and didn’t say which Dakota came first, the culmination of a decade of geographical enmity between the Yankton and Bismarck power centres, as well as the finishing stroke of the Republican plan to pack the US Senate with more members of its own party.
State agencies detest Open Records requests, perhaps in large part due to the simple fact that they generally require a staff member to pour through the raw data that a reporter, lawyer, or statistician really, really wants to see, whilst the staff member mainly cares about all the other work they would rather be doing, and there’s a lot of things to copy, sharpie out, and send out to lawyers for final review.
The whole matter could be settled by, for example, a policy where information is born free – where the use of sensitive information like payment or identity numbers are easily severable where used in forms, and a general notion that wherever a private version of a document is sitting, there is already a public version of it sitting next to it in the folder or on the server, and an irreproachable reason why that secret is being kept.
But that would make too much sense or take too much time for everything in the face of the low odds that anyone will ever inquire about any particular thing the state is doing. So to threaten the continued health of what’s left of Open Records, all it really takes is a bad moment, say a ballot measure’s advertising agency picking up B-roll that just happens to include the former manager of the Devils Lake Chamber of Commerce, and next thing you know, transparency is off the rails.
Despite the red herring about faces and waivers, what’s ultimately happening here is the state bureaucracy is proposing changes to laws that will limit public discourse and hoard state-funded and state-collected data and media for internal use only. And it has featured state employees making statements that sound like a political attack run during the middle of an election.
Now, this completely sets aside the fact that you can’t claim copyright against a public policy advertisement. Which could really be a whole post in itself.
Maybe the expectation is that with no Michael Geist or Lawrence Lessig to say a second word, the state government will write a Christmas card to itself that neuters what’s left of Open Records. Well, if any such bill appears in the North Dakota Legislature, I will physically be there to harp upon its folly.
The ads may still be airing nonstop, but for voters like me, the results are already in; early voting at the Alerus Centre began today.
I’m fairly happy to have made up my mind on the state races and measures. I can only hope that I have more to be happy about next week. A couple wins on the offices side would be huge for the League.